Ever wondered how it would be if you did not have to take care of the modules installed in your Drupal environment? How much time would you save by having such a website? We're offering just that, for free!

With our hosting plans, that cost no more than anywhere else, you get hosting space AND the powerful Drupal CMS auto-maintained for you. A given for anyone!

Click here to get started right now. This offer will not last!

Thank you.
Alexis

System tables and how to edit them is just not defined in the SQL language, unfortunately. So different database systems have different solutions to handle their table declarations. PostgreSQL is no different.

In most cases, MySQL uses some special instruction to update system information. In PostgreSQL, you have internal tables that the administrator can access and tweak as required.

Please, follow this [confirmation_link] to complete your registration to the White Theme mailing list.

Thank you.
Alexis

I have been wondering, for a while, how the triggers where generated in Drupal. I know that one can catch a message by writing a hook function and you have hundreds of those available. However, how are the triggers working?!

The fact is that triggers require you to write a function. The Core Trigger module has a set of specialized functions for the Core modules and it is limited to that. In other words, you cannot expect new modules to simply define an array and get the triggers to work (I was really wondering how could that really work?!)

Today I finally solved a problem that was bothering me for a while. A Drupal site I installed for a friend of mine would not accept the Clean URL set. This is when the URL does not need to include the rather ugly ?q=<path>.

The more I was looking into it and the more it looked like the problem was coming from the Apache installation.

I guess I liked Netscape just way too much... I used Mozilla after Netscape went down and bust, then I continued with SeaMonkey 1.x and now I just finished installing SeaMonkey 2.0.

There are features in this system that are just better than in FireFox. However, SeaMonkey 2.0 is a re-sync. with FireFox 3.x. In other words, this is very similar to FireFox, with the correct display features of the HTML code. But it keeps the menu, preferences and look in general of SeaMonkey. (although the fonts have changed... I'll have to get used to those!?)

So, I was upset, it can happen right?! Now, if you would kindly go to this page:

<blah>

and answer the few questions there, I'd really appreciate! 8-)